Adversarial review

Adversarial review is running several reviewers with deliberately different lenses, or several investigators told to disprove each other, rather than one reviewer working sequentially. The rationale is anchoring: once one theory is explored, later investigation bends toward it, and a single reviewer gravitates to one class of issue at a time. The mechanism is sound and cheap to try. The supporting evidence is vendor-stated rather than benchmarked, and nobody should pretend otherwise.